| |
![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Fine Upstanding Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Telford, UK
Posts: 801
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Fins for Sasquatch Ok seems that XXL jetfins are like rocking-horse droppings Does ANYONE have them in stock? Don't wanna trek all the way to portland to try the DiveSystem fins Tried turtles - they seem OK, but Joe Hesketh seemd to feel they don't transfer power like proper jets. Anyone disagree? seems a shame to spend 20 quid extra for a worse fin! T |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Fine Upstanding Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Telford, UK
Posts: 801
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | cheers I've used Turtles with my current Welly-type drysuit boots and they fit proppa-bostin' so no worries there. Maybe Joe will post some force-transmometer graphs and material flexiograms for us? ![]() |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| New Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: London, UK
Posts: 658
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Maybe Joe will post some force-transmometer graphs and material flexiograms for us? Dah, all those data are on my other computer, otherwise gladly ![]() ![]() Turtles aren't that bad, it's not like they don't work or anything. Physically, they are shorter and wider, not as heavy and flex differently to the Jets. Like I said, I've worn both extensively and much prefer the Jets. YMMV. Joe |
|
| | #10 (permalink) |
| New Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 264
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | XXL Jetfins are for those of us who have feet bigger than the legendary bigfoot. I'd guess that the minimum foot size would be US15 or UK 14 using rockboots. You can get 2 US size 12 feet in one footpocket and still have room to stomp a few liters of grapes for winemaking:-) Try the Turtles, at least you won't need a GPS to find your way from one side of the footpocket to the other. Michael |
|