It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register for free click here
DIR Explorers
       

GUE Procedures We'll try to put stuff which relates to GUE rulings on various proceedures in here...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 8th, 2006, 05:04 PM   #81 (permalink)
TobyFish (Online)
Fine Upstanding Member
 
TobyFish's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,213
TobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond reputeTobyFish has a reputation beyond repute

Quote: (Originally Posted by Brian A)View Post
I suppose so unless this happens...

my point is I think you can get blinded other ways - although the mask is the most common. You are right that in a standard team you need 4 masks to fail before one of you is blind for the rest of the dive, but I have a prescription mask so I only need two to fail before I am seriously compromised

contact lens wash-out would be fun to rectify under water

I think the blind ascent is a great team-building exercise (including building trust) but you're right that unconcious diver would achieve much the same with more practical use. In reality. I think I'd be prefer a trusted buddy to "fly" me to the surface as a blind diver in the same way as he would for an unconcious one. signalling my buoyancy rather than just fixing it is a potential failure point
__________________
Rude-boy Volvo
"Gangsta Rollin' in me nine-six-oh"
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2006, 05:53 PM   #82 (permalink)
Brian Allen(Offline)
GUE Instructor
 
Brian Allen's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London & Plymouth
Posts: 623
Brian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant futureBrian Allen has a brilliant future

Quote: (Originally Posted by TobyFish)View Post
my point is I think you can get blinded other ways - although the mask is the most common. You are right that in a standard team you need 4 masks to fail before one of you is blind for the rest of the dive, but I have a prescription mask so I only need two to fail before I am seriously compromised

contact lens wash-out would be fun to rectify under water

I think the blind ascent is a great team-building exercise (including building trust) but you're right that unconcious diver would achieve much the same with more practical use. In reality. I think I'd be prefer a trusted buddy to "fly" me to the surface as a blind diver in the same way as he would for an unconcious one. signalling my buoyancy rather than just fixing it is a potential failure point
Have not had a problem with contact lense washout, I'm -5.0 in each eye and did long mask off swims with my eyes wide open on the ITC. The first swim was fine but on the second I lost one lense. So I took the opportunity to see if I could dive blind, and didn't have a problem reading gauges or getting visuals on my team with the good eye shut anyway... I think you and Clare hit the nail on the head really, i found the drill taught me trust as well as making me get my buoyancy/trim while stressed nailed.
__________________
...dive planning again ...

http://www.justgiving.com/Brian-Allen


GUE fundamentals and Halcyon Equipment Online www.ocean-explorers.co.uk

Last edited by Brian Allen; November 8th, 2006 at 05:58 PM..
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2006, 05:59 PM   #83 (permalink)
Joe Hesketh(Offline)
New Member
 
Joe Hesketh's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 688
Joe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Hesketh has a reputation beyond repute

Also remember it’s not just a blind diver drill. There are other failures on that drill, usually some combination of valve, light and gas (or a runaway inflate as well if the instructor’s feeing mean) which are the “real” issues to deal with on that dive. The no mask may be a bit extreme, but is easily and authentically simulated, is a really good test of teamwork and adds task loading to the other issues. The actual scenarios themselves are less important than their impact on the dive and the way they can be triaged.

No-mask can happen albeit it is normally dealt with before surfacing. However the same is true of light failures, but no-one would try to argue that overhead training might sufficiently prepare you to deal with a light failure by banking on having more lights available. The chances of having to exit a cave on the back of 9 light failures is about 1.95 quadrillion to one[1] but you still train for a no-lights exits. I’d argue no-mask in open water followed similar logic.

I think a deep rescue would be worthwhile to practice, but is in a slightly different category. The idea behind the hump day dives, as with the multiple scenarios you get in cave training, is that you are forced to triage problems and then make an otherwise normal exit/ascent, rather than any kind of emergency ascent.

Quote: (Originally Posted by TobyFish)
I think I'd be prefer a trusted buddy to "fly" me to the surface as a blind diver in the same way as he would for an unconcious one. signalling my buoyancy rather than just fixing it is a potential failure point
Theorising about this on the internet without actually having done it is a potential bullsh*t point

Joe

[1] Based on a light having a one in fifty chance of failure, which I believe was the figure used to arrive at three lights being a reasonable balance, according to Bill Gavin anyway.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2006, 07:00 PM   #84 (permalink)
Janos(Offline)
"Two Sheds"
 
Janos's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 412
Janos is a glorious beacon of lightJanos is a glorious beacon of lightJanos is a glorious beacon of lightJanos is a glorious beacon of lightJanos is a glorious beacon of lightJanos is a glorious beacon of light

Quote: (Originally Posted by GLOC)View Post
But then both/all three of you are blind and...
Good point.

Quote: (Originally Posted by Gloc)
...and it is unlikely that you would get a silt-out from 40m to the surface.
Not in Dover in the winter!

Janos
__________________
You can lead a horse to water but you can't climb a ladder with a large bell in both hands - Vic Reeves
DO of Hellfins
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2006, 10:52 PM   #85 (permalink)
Dave Dowson(Offline)
New Member
 
Dave Dowson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Stockton-on-Tees, UK
Posts: 48
Dave Dowson is on a distinguished road

Quote: (Originally Posted by Brian A)View Post
Right hand grabs double ender off right shoulder D-ring, clips through back of bungee, remove light head from hand, clip to right shoulder D-ring, it's pretty quick.
I understand that you can train and make this quick, but also I've seen people task loaded and concequently struggle with the loop and double ender.

Really though, can someone explain why a permenantly connected small bolt snap instead of the loop won't work - then it's always there and it's a single step task to clip it off.

I currently dive this config, i.e. two bolt snaps on the light, the one on the Goodmans been the "normal" size and the one on the cable protector being the "small" size - I've had no problems with this. Does anyone know what's wrong with this and why we need to have the bungee? (Sorry in advance if I've missed this in the previous 8 pages!)

Dave
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2006, 11:23 PM   #86 (permalink)
Divingniknaks(Offline)
Resident purveyor of shiney kit....
 
Divingniknaks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Midlands UK
Posts: 1,040
Divingniknaks is a splendid one to beholdDivingniknaks is a splendid one to beholdDivingniknaks is a splendid one to beholdDivingniknaks is a splendid one to beholdDivingniknaks is a splendid one to beholdDivingniknaks is a splendid one to beholdDivingniknaks is a splendid one to beholdDivingniknaks is a splendid one to behold

Send a message via Skype™ to Divingniknaks
Dave this one goes back to earlier this year, before you joined I think.

Updates from GUE - Lampheads

Thats the original thread that kind of explained the thinking behind it.

HTH

.
__________________
Phill
-----------------------------
Salvo Lights, DirZone Gear , Frog Wings

Dive ? http://www.divingniknaks.com

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4
DirExplorers.Com ©2005 - 2009
All rights reserved, no republishing of content without written permission.
By using this website you have agreed to our Terms & Conditions of Use

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60